Smoking Hot Dividends and the Hot Summer

The good old Big Tobacco company Altria (MO) just paid me a dividend.  I got paid $4.28 which I then reinvested to get 0.1217 shares at $35.17.  

As much as I was disappointed that Prop 29 failed, it is nice that I still profited from Big Tobacco's win.  For the uninformed, Prop 29 would have imposed a $1.00 tax on each pack of cigarettes sold in California.  Supporters claim that the additional tax would have paid for cancer research, tobacco law enforcement and smoking reduction programs.  As one might expect, Big Tobacco spent $46.8 Million (Altria/Philip Morris alone spent $27,531,416 - full disclosure).  Far outspending Prop 29 supporters' $12.3 Million.  The silver lining for anti-smoking supporters is that it was a tight race: 50.3% No vs. 49.7% Yes. The fact that the difference of 0.6% was all the extra $34.5 Million could buy, perhaps they'll be more successful next time. 

Now I bet I'm confusing some people with my 2-sided position.  How can I own tobacco stocks (MO) and yet support a ballot measure that would severely affect the Tobacco Industry?  Simple, I want a cure for cancer.  If the additional $1.00 tax would bring us closer, then so be it.  I also believe that smokers would not stop smoking even if they have to pay an additional dollar per pack of smokes.  They are too addicted to smoking and it would be a hard habit to break.  Either way, I'll still profit for the habit of addiction.  

In other news, I just posted a LIMIT order for 5 shares of Lululemon.  Yes, I did a limit order instead of my usual Automatic Investment tactic.  So what did I get for the extra $5.95 in fees?  Well, I got 5 shares of LULU at $55.90 (currently LULU is at $55.85 - 8:36AM).  I do not think waiting till next Tuesday for the order to post would have made the difference.  I believe LULU will be higher than $55.90 by next Tuesday. I would rather pay a bit more in fees to catch the downward movement now than save the $5.95 only to ride the possible rally next week.  I'd rather be wrong and next week and still end up with 5 shares of LULU than be right and end up with less than 5 shares of LULU.

So here is my Lululemon thesis:

LULU peaked at $80.30 on May 3, 2012 (52-week high of $81.09) and has been moving down since then.   I believe LULU has been dragged down by the Euro crisis.  I believe this decline would reach the bottom soon and LULU, along with it's athletic retail competitors would experience a boost during the summer months and of course, the Olympics.  I am confident this would happen because of what I've been seeing on the streets and at the gym.  People are out and about walking in the streets, working out and trying to get fit.  I still see a huge number of LULU gear on women and some men.  LULU's business model and their steady expansion in North America would be enough for them to keep growing and put money back in my pocket.

The summer Olympics would be another catalyst I'm looking at.  Fans would be watching the world's best athletes and would be "inspired" to buy some athletic apparel.  Sure, Nike, Reebok and Addidas would take the lion's share of the new active wear purchases but I believe the Lululemon brand would start capturing new customers.  If LULU managed to sponsor at least 1 medal winner, this could be big boost for LULU.  Even if the athlete wore Nike or Reebok during the events, if those athletes start wearing Lululemon for their other activities... like yoga sessions perhaps, LULU would be poised to benefit from this.  Only time will tell.

One more thing about LULU.  I have noticed that the women who wear Lululemon yoga pant also wear those pants as part of their daily apparel.  It is almost like what happened to UGGs (Deckers - DECK).  I would not discount the possibility that Lululemon apparel would become more than just yoga pants and workout gear.  It may even become an UGGs-style phenomenon.  However, unlike UGGs, LULU yoga pants look great and even if the yoga wear as daily wear trend dies down, people women would still need to buy yoga pants for their yoga sessions.  

With these points in mind, I predict LULU would do the head and shoulders movement and would rise back up to it's $80-$90 mantle within the next 12-16 months.  So yes, I am long term investor of LULU.

Chasing Altria's (MO) Ex-Dividend Date, Dodging Yelp, Xilinx Inc. (XLNX) and Energy Transfer Partners (ETP) Pays Me Some Dividends and Can Anyone Stop Apple (AAPL)?

I just bought 7 more shares of Altria (MO).  

I executed a limit order for $30.41 which bumped my shares of MO to 10.3151.  It cost me $222.82. I bought 7 shares for $212.87 plus the transaction fee was $9.95.  This order was $5.95 more than what it would have cost if I had waited for the Automatic Investment Plan.  I did not wait for the AIP because it would buy the shares on MO's Ex-Dividend Date (Tuesday, March 13, 2012) which would make me ineligible to receive the dividend (per SEC definition of the Ex-Dividend Date).  This would have been a loss of $2.87 (7 x $0.41/share).

Where would I gain the $3.08 difference?  That would come from stock price appreciation (MO's chart has been trending up and today it closed at $30.46) and yield (I'll be paid dividends for 10.3151 shares instead of 3.3151).  I would be able to use the $4.22 ($4.2291 rounding down) to reinvest in MO pushing my yield higher.  

The dividend would be paid on April  9, 2012.

Speaking of dividends, Energy Transfer Partners (ETP) and Xilinx Inc (XLNX) just paid me some nice dividends.  XLNX paid $1.19 and ETP paid $5.91.  These dividends were reinvested in the stocks my yields.  I love dividends.

In other news, Yelp (YELP) went public recently.  Just like LinkedIn (LNKD), Zynga (ZNGA), Pandora (P) and Groupon (GRPN), I avoided these new IPOs since I did not get any shares pre-IPO and I do not have enough cash (and time) to get in the deal at the moment of the IPO.  With the exception of LNKD and in some way, ZNGA, these new tech IPOS have no profits to speak of.  Their business models rely heavily on Online Advertising and "Eyeballs" while their costs are going up (content licensing, customer acquisition and labor).

Although I'm not a total Bear on these tech stocks, I am not risking my hard earn cash investing in companies that make no money.   I am even on the belief that even Facebook would fail to satisfy Wall Street post-IPO.

Only time would tell.

Finally, Apple (AAPL) just announced their first major product launch since the death of Steve Jobs.  The new iPad is poised to keep Apple's lead in the tablet market and is targeting the market share of laptop makers.  During the keynote presentation, Apple CEO Tim Cook declared the iPad as the major leader  of the  Post-PC era.  Mr. Cook and company did really well during the keynote and even though it lacked the Steve Jobs Halo Effect, the recent keynote was filled with oohs and ahhs from the crowd and the tech community.  The new iPad boasted the new Retina Display, 4G LTE, a faster graphics processing chip and an amazing battery life all in the same "low" starting price of $499.  Apple also kept the iPad 2 at a lower $399 price.  Tech pundits and analysts predict AAPL would sell at least 10-15 million units on the first weekend.  I'm even willing to bet they would sell up to 20 million units.  My only fear with this prediction is whether Apple has enough iPads to sell that weekend.  I'm sure the workers at FoxConn worked double/triple overtime since November producing these magical devices.  

AAPL's stock price played around $528-$536 during the announcement.  Normally, an Apple event brings down the stock price low enough for a nice re-entry but this time, the stock price held its own.  Perhaps Tim Cook symbolized stability in the company and not seeing a frail looking Steve Jobs made investors "feel" secure about Apple.

Although Apple fans including me would have preferred seeing Mr. Jobs work his magic on stage, his presence, in spite of his health issues, was sorely missed.  As for AAPL's future, I am bullish that this company would keep printing money for years to come.  Their stock price though high, is cheap compared to it's competitors.  The PEG ratio is at 0.66, making it the cheapest of my positions (believe it or not).  The product line, high profit margins and brand equity would keep AAPL on top for a while.  As long as the company continues to innovate and execute, I would keep investing in Apple (and buy a product or two).

Going Against The Grain - Investing in Stocks When Others Pull Out

I got some extra dough this week.

I decided to activate my auto invest plan for Tuesday.  And here are my picks:

LULU = $140.00 (2.71 shares @$50.18 + $4 fee)
ETP    = $140.00 (3.06 shares @$44.38 + $4 fee)

I'm still bullish on LULU because of the customer (brand loyalty) loyalty and the fact the LULU does not compete in the cheap apparel market.  LULU's customers are willing to pay up for the products because of the style, technology and what the company stands for.  LULU does not pay millions of dollars to have pro athlete endorse their products.  Instead, LULU does it in a local, word-of-mouth marketing strategy.  Free yoga classes given by local personal trainers build a community of loyal customers (and endorsers).

ETP is my energy play for the coming winter.  Natural gas and LPG will be used by millions to heat their homes and cook their food this coming winter.  Plus, I get paid a dividend just to wait for the stock to go up.  Plus I think the moves Kinder Morgan Partners (KMP) would have some pin action in the Nat-Gas sector.

I would have bought some more AAPL but I'm a bit short on liquid cash.  I'm still bullish on AAPL even after Steve Jobs' death.  I am confident that the genius CEO had 2-5 years of product line in the pipes and I shall review my position in the next 6 months and see if the new leadership has captured the Steve Jobs magic.

The recent decline of the Stock Market (Thanks a lot Europe) caused a lot of people to fear the market.  This is good news for me.  The time to buy into the market is when everyone is afraid and baby, everyone IS afraid.  Due to my age, I can afford to take some near term declines from my positions because I have a lot of time to recover.. unfortunately, the boomers do not have a lot of time.